Comments on: Havok™ Early Adopter - 6 Fixes http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/ News and thoughts about my adventures in Second Life, Combat: Samurai Island, and Virtual Worlds Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:58:36 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Havok 4 now being called a Release Candidate - even though it’s still horribly broken « Samurai Pickle http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-532 Havok 4 now being called a Release Candidate - even though it’s still horribly broken « Samurai Pickle Sat, 08 Mar 2008 02:41:18 +0000 http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-532 [...] issue that I reported about C:SI kicks not working in Havok 4 is still unassigned, apparently being completely ignored by the powers that be in the rush to get a broken implementation to the finish [...] […] issue that I reported about C:SI kicks not working in Havok 4 is still unassigned, apparently being completely ignored by the powers that be in the rush to get a broken implementation to the finish […]

]]> By: Havok 4 now being called a Release Candidate - even though it’s still horribly broken at Daikon Forge http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-529 Havok 4 now being called a Release Candidate - even though it’s still horribly broken at Daikon Forge Sat, 08 Mar 2008 02:40:15 +0000 http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-529 [...] issue that I reported about C:SI kicks not working in Havok 4 is still unassigned, apparently being completely ignored by the powers that be in the rush to get a broken implementation to the finish [...] […] issue that I reported about C:SI kicks not working in Havok 4 is still unassigned, apparently being completely ignored by the powers that be in the rush to get a broken implementation to the finish […]

]]> By: Havok 4 now being called a Release Candidate - even though it’s still horribly broken at Daikon Forge http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-528 Havok 4 now being called a Release Candidate - even though it’s still horribly broken at Daikon Forge Sat, 08 Mar 2008 02:35:47 +0000 http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-528 [...] issue that I reported about C:SI kicks not working in Havok 4 is still unassigned, apparently being completely ignored by the powers that be in the rush to get a broken implementation to the finish line. Technorati [...] […] issue that I reported about C:SI kicks not working in Havok 4 is still unassigned, apparently being completely ignored by the powers that be in the rush to get a broken implementation to the finish line. Technorati […]

]]> By: Aimee Congrejo http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-359 Aimee Congrejo Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:24:58 +0000 http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-359 Voted, watched, and commented. =^.^= Voted, watched, and commented. =^.^=

]]> By: Takuan http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-350 Takuan Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:12:09 +0000 http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-350 I appreciate that Malachi, thank you! I appreciate that Malachi, thank you!

]]> By: Malachi Rothschild http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-347 Malachi Rothschild Fri, 22 Feb 2008 17:33:47 +0000 http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-347 I voted and added a bit more info about the way kick-push is behaving in a comment. I voted and added a bit more info about the way kick-push is behaving in a comment.

]]> By: Takuan http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-343 Takuan Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:29:11 +0000 http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-343 Thank you! The more people that vote (despite my poor description of the problem) the more it would seem likely that LL will take it seriously. The way that kick currently works is a very large part of many people's strategy, and it would be a major blow to C:SI for Linden Lab to eliminate that through apathy. Thank you! The more people that vote (despite my poor description of the problem) the more it would seem likely that LL will take it seriously.

The way that kick currently works is a very large part of many people’s strategy, and it would be a major blow to C:SI for Linden Lab to eliminate that through apathy.

]]> By: Judo Jung http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-340 Judo Jung Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:17:38 +0000 http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-340 Voted. Important issue! Lack of push with kick detracts from the underlying elegance of the C:SI system, IMHO. Urge others to do the same. Voted. Important issue! Lack of push with kick detracts from the underlying elegance of the C:SI system, IMHO. Urge others to do the same.

]]> By: Takuan http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-339 Takuan Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:47:23 +0000 http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-339 That is an oversight on my part. It should indeed be Major, because there is no workaround in a heterogeneous grid. I have updated the priority. That is an oversight on my part. It should indeed be Major, because there is no workaround in a heterogeneous grid. I have updated the priority.

]]> By: Colin http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-338 Colin Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:26:22 +0000 http://www.daikonforge.com/webtab/2008/02/21/havok-early-adopter-6-fixes/#comment-338 Voted. I almost changed the priority to "major", but didn't. Maybe we should change it to "showstopper". I'm sure they'd look at the issue then. Voted. I almost changed the priority to “major”, but didn’t. Maybe we should change it to “showstopper”. I’m sure they’d look at the issue then.

]]>